| |
The Red Army Faction and Al
Qaeda are comparable neither in tactics, nor in ideology. In Time’s ‘Red Ghosts’, however, the two
are put on par as regards their effect on civil liberties; a comparison that is
just as fallacious.
There is an undeniable non
sequitur in author Purvis’ conclusion; he states that the prevention of terrorism is
“morally complex”, but that the best way to fight it is to let the law take its
course. I would agree that the best
way to fight crime like terrorist acts is through due process of the law. That
the prevention of terrorism is politically complex is true, but that it is
morally so, is nonsense. The RAF kidnapped, tortured
and murdered. Now that security demands mean the CIA is engaged in much the
same practices, the German government is ready to turn a blind eye. All of
these, including a government’s self-delusion, are criminal acts, and there is
no complexity in their morality.
The extreme measures
undertaken by West German police dealing with the RAF in the 1970’s
contextualise current American hysteria in the war on terror. However, the
article neglects to show how the benefit of this experience condemns Germany for not
standing up for its citizens.
Most young Germans oppose both
the early release of the RAF’s surviving leaders, and the tolerance of terror
flights in German airspace. Mr Purvis should focus, not on the legally dogmatic
German youth, but on the members of the Bundestag who are far too ready to
accommodate both the RAF and the Bush administration. In response to 'Red Ghosts' by Andrew Purvis, as featured in Time Magazine 19.02.07
|
| | Posted 2/20/2007 9:08 AM - 2 Views - 0 eProps - 0 comments
- recommend
    - recs0
- share
- email
 - sent0
Give eProps or Post a Comment |