| |
Power sharing in Iraq is
complicated; the country’s 40 million citizens are divided along ideological,
religious and social lines. It’s hard to see much being shared out equally in
such a climate. Nonetheless, in approving the draft of an oil law, the Iraqi
cabinet has taken the first step to oil revenue sharing.
Steve Negus’ article ‘Iraq cabinet
agrees draft law for oil industry’, describes the role of the Kurds in this
process.
The autonomous region of
Iraqi Kurdistan signed exploration and development contracts with foreign oil
companies long before cabinet’s approval of the draft law. As Negus hints
earlier in the piece, the Kurds want to get their money’s worth.
A political aspect Negus
neglects to mention is the city of Kirkuk.
The Kurds lay claim to the city Saddam Hussein tried to Arabize over the last
three decades. Kirkuk also happens to be Iraq’s biggest
oil town.
The dispute over Kirkuk has far-reaching
political effects, but, one closer to home is revenue sharing. With control
over the crown jewels of Iraqi oil, the Kurds could guarantee themselves their
15 percent of national oil revenue, rather than the seven Baghdad has let drip their way.
Kirkuk, like much of Iraq suffers regular terrorist
attacks; this disrupts oil flow. With effective security forces, Iraqi
Kurdistan is unlike many other regions. Kurdish administration of Kirkuk and its oil could
encourage foreign investment and boost Iraqi oil production back to pre-war
levels.
I have to admit that,
considering how long it has taken to come up with this first step towards oil
and profit sharing, it’s no wonder the Iraqi cabinet is delaying handling other
political hot potatoes. A comment on Financial Times article ‘Iraq cabinet
agrees draft law for oil industry’, by Steve Negus, dated 27th February 2007
|
| | Posted 3/6/2007 7:39 AM - 1 View - 0 eProps - 0 comments
- recommend
    - recs0
- share
- email
 - sent0
Give eProps or Post a Comment |